Articles by Walksheet.com

You are currently browsing Walksheet.com’s articles.

By sham independent candidate, we mean the third candidate in what was a two-way race, recruited to suck votes away from either the incumbent, or the challenger.

Within the last week, Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce has been accused of engineering the candidacy of a third person in his recall election in order to take votes away from his recall challenger, Jerry Lewis.  A judge this week found that Pearce’s allies had indeed recruited Olivia Cortes to run in order to siphon votes away from the challenger.  Ms. Cortes dropped out of the race when Lewis’s supporters questioned her candidacy.

From the New York Times:

Greg Western, a Pearce ally who is the chairman of the East Valley Tea Party, was a central figure in the scheme and became Ms. Cortes’s campaign adviser. Soon, signs promoting Ms. Cortes’s candidacy appeared on street corners, bearing the motto made famous by Cesar Chavez of the United Farm Workers: “Sí, Se Puede!”

Ms. Cortes avoided the news media for weeks, and the few interviews she did give showed her to be shaky on the issues. Her candidacy began falling apart after another candidate, Jerry Lewis, who like Mr. Pearce is a Republican, began his own campaign. Allies of Mr. Lewis’s went to court to challenge Ms. Cortes’s election bid as a sham.

This practice of recruiting sham candidates to run as a third party and siphon votes away from one candidate is more common than one would think, but this story has a twist–Ms. Cortes seems to have been genuine in her opposition to Senator Pearce, who gained national notoriety for authoring Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration bill last year.

The New York Times story points out that the judge even pointed out how this case differed than other sham candidates, especially fictional ones portrayed in movies:

The judge also said Ms. Cortes’s case did not resemble the subterfuge displayed in “The Distinguished Gentleman,” a movie in which the actor Eddie Murphy, playing a character named Jeff Johnson, runs for Congress after an incumbent with the same name dies.

Nice one, judge.

Seriously though, have you seen examples in campaigns of sham candidates being outed, or being able to ride through the election scott free?  Has a case like in the “Distinguished Gentleman” ever happened in real life?

Leave your thoughts in the comments or on Facebook!

The debate between whether yard signs are effective or not is a never ending debate in local campaigns, but one thing is almost always certain, candidates still end up getting yard signs whether they think they are effective or not.

We’re not going to enter that debate directly here, but instead focus on a group of Democrats in Hartford, Connecticut who have banded together and decided to forgo yard signs, saying its for the environment.

From the Hartford-Courant:

Some say they’re doing it for the environment, acknowledging, though, that they save money and avoid the hassle of putting them up, replacing stolen ones and taking them down when the party is over.

Carol Anest, Democratic town chairwoman in Newington, said she pitched the no-lawn-sign idea to candidates in the November election at their first strategy meeting. They were receptive, she said.

But she was rebuffed when she tried to get local Republicans to go along.

“We want to expose our candidates to the voters,” said Ben Ancona, Newington’s Republican town chairman.

It’s as if these group of Democrats are putting the theory that lawn signs aren’t effective–in many respects, their candidacies –truly on the line.

Do you think that these candidates will be fine without the yard signs, or are they foolish for giving their Republican challengers an upper hand, however small?

Leave your thoughts in the comments!

Click here for Google map.

 

Arkansas
Sales Tax Issue, Fayetteville

Iowa
City Council – Iowa City
City Council (Primary) – Burlington

North Carolina
Local Elections All Over North Carolina

Wisconsin
Special Primary Election, State Assembly – District 95

Elections happen every week in the U.S.–if not every day!  Are we missing any? If so, email us at contact@walksheet.com and check in again for next Tuesday’s elections.

Columbus Day isn’t just a day where you can’t go to the bank or receive mail, it’s also an important campaign day leading up to many November local elections, and a time for political activists of all stripes to get a day off and let their freak flag fly.

From parades, precinct walks, to protests, here are 5 videos illustrating the importance of Columbus Day.

1. The Union Precinct Walk

Most government workers get the day off today, which means union members are out in force for precinct walks to labor-backed candidates.  Just pray your lucky enough to get a visit from a walker with a handle-bar mustache (0:42)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DYAaDFnGFY


2. The Columbus Day Rally

In this video, New York State Senate candidate Sam Roberts gets to rev up a crowd of excited Democrats waiting to see former President Bill Clinton.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQS1yeuDft0

 

3.  The Columbus Day Parade

As far as we know, there aren’t many Columbus Day parades outside of New York, but this video illustrates how important it is for candidates and elected officials. (Check out recently elected NY Congressman Bob Turner at 0:36)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItzPg1apSkA


4. The “Un-Related to Columbus Day” Columbus Day Protest

People who are passionate about things also get the day off for Columbus Day.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=nww78YXE7IE

 

5. The “Anti-Columbus Day” Columbus Day Protest

Some people hate Columbus Day…especially these people.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8N8dqctBWI

 

 

 


 

A town in Utah is attempting to tamp down on illegally placed campaign signs–i.e. signs that clutter up street medians, parkways, the corners of parks–by “having a handful of designated public locations for campaigners to place their signs during election season.”

According to the Standard-Examiner:

City officials have had problems in the past with election signs being placed in parking strips. They hope the new policy will eliminate that problem in addition to keeping their city clean and organized in the upcoming month.

Having political signs turn into blight on public property and abandoned lots is sort of like negative campaigning–once one person does it, then everyone has to do it.

Hopefully this might be able to tamp down on the tendency for campaign signs to be blight.

Image via gongus

They say money is the mother’s milk of politics (shocked, we know!), but you have to have something to accept all those checks in.  Below are five tips for creating a good, if not great, contribution envelope:

1. Include all the right information: If your contribution limit is $550, and you put $500, you will be surprised at how much money you will lose out on. Make sure that all appropriate and accurate information is included on your remit envelope.

2. Make it easy and simple for the donor. If they are giving you $5 or $500, make sure your envelope doesn’t look like an IRS 1040 form. Meaning make sure the text is legible, it is clear what they need to fill out, and the lines are big enough to write on.

3. Be sure to ask for an endorsement – with a signature. In terms of the political campaign, endorsements are as good or better than money in some instances. The remit envelope is a great place to kill two birds with one stone, but if you didn’t get a signature, don’t complain if the endorsement doesn’t hold later. You can also solicit volunteers with it too!

4. Be Sure to Proofread It! Candidates and campaign managers will spend hours pouring over the words in your brochure, but many times the remit envelope is given just a quick glance. You don’t want to throw away good remits if you misspelled the candidates last name.

5. Say Thank You. These people are giving you their hard earned dollars…you should say thank you in advance. Some candidates put a simple “Thank You ” on the back flap, or make sure to to say it within the inside of the envelope.

George Washington University Political Scientist John Sides has a terrific article over at the NY Times 538 blog which gives his scientific findings on some particulars of political campaign advertising.

Among his findings are:

1. Campaign ads matter more when the candidates are unfamiliar.

2. Campaign ads matter more when a candidate can outspend the opponent.

3. Campaign ads can matter, but not for long.

The main point of his article, The Moneyball of Campaign Advertising, though is to illustrate the difference in approach to campaigns that seasoned consultants take versus how a political scientist views elections.

The difference is in gut feeling versus hard facts:

What works is not a big bat or a golden glove, it is a campaign message. The crucial moments happen when the campaign deploys an advertisement that the advisers crafted. The championship is simply the election.

The frustration that the focus of “Moneyball,” Billy Beane, the general manager of the Oakland Athletics, felt when listening to his scouts talking about baseball players is the frustration that a political scientist feels when listening to many campaign consultants, journalists and political commentators talk about political advertising. In their telling, campaign ads win elections, and often in dramatic fashion.”

The entire post is worth a read by clicking here.

If you are a consultant, how much does gut feeling factor into things, and does the political science even matter?

With the rise of technology, social media, and millions more ways for us to communicate with each other over the last couple decades, also comes the downside to that technology.

Forget the proliferation of porn–we’re talking about all the ways that candidates have now to sling mud at each other.  One of these is anonymous hit blog (or twitter/facebook account, or plain old non-blog website).  In most states, the rules on identifying yourself on the web are much more lax than for any other form of communication (like direct mail or brochures, where most if not all states and municipalities require a name and address to go with the attacker).

It comes to our attention from a great op-ed piece by Chapman Rackaway of The Wichita Eagle, who addresses several different tactics in Kansas legislative races:

Kultala’s staff bought MarkGilstrap.com and redirected traffic to her campaign webpage. But the truly shady tactic was the creation of a blog and Twitter account under the handle “Broken Kansas.”

Anonymously created and managed for the single purpose of smearing other candidates without the regular political accountability that officially sanctioned attacks by campaigns, the hit blog is the new equivalent of the old gotcha question, “Senator, have you stopped beating your wife?”

Gilstrap’s campaign should have purchased his domain name in advance, certainly, but the fact the Kultala campaign engaged in such a base strategy did not reflect well on her campaign.

Note, that last sentence says it all.  If you are reading this article, and you haven’t purchased your own domain name, stop reading and go do it.  Seriously.  

In the case quoted, it was the offender Kultala and her campaign who ultimately took the hit:

Kultala admitted to Kansas Watchdog that a consulting firm, Tugboat Media, had purchased the Gilstrap domain: “After investigating, I learned that a member of a local consulting team I had recently hired to set up my campaign website and social media had purchased domains under the name of my opponent and redirected online searches to my campaign website. While I was unaware this tactic was being used, I take full responsibility. I’ve made it clear to my consultants that this is not how my campaign will be conducted.”

Click here to read the full article. 

Do you think anonymous hit blogs and other sorts of tactics like that are necessary evils of campaigns? How would you deal with them if you were/are the candidate?

Leave your thoughts in the comments!

Image via meretH

Click for Google Map

Alaska
Municipal Elections all Over Alaska 

Florida
Mayor & City Council – City of Homestead 

Iowa
Sheriff Special Election – Jones County 

New Mexico
City Council – Albuquerque 

South Carolina
County Council – Colleton County 

West Virginia
Special Election for Governor 

Elections happen every week in the U.S.–if not every day!  Are we missing any? If so, email us at contact@walksheet.com and check in again for next Tuesday’s elections.

Ben Donahower is the co-author of the free GOTV ebook, Get Out the Vote to Win, and blogs about political lawn signs. Ben is an authority on marketing for political organizations. Get out the vote is perhaps the most exciting part of a political campaign. In the lead up to Election Day, there is excitement and activity at every turn. During this brief phase of the campaign, however, there is little room for error. The GOTV plan must be dead on and executed flawlessly. Unlike other points in the campaign, there is precious little time to change course. Getting it right the first time matters. Get Out the Vote to Win is a free ebook with tips and tricks from eight political consultants who are recognized experts in their field. While the ebook won’t run your GOTV campaign for you, it will point you in the right direction and give you some ideas to help focus your efforts. These are three of the most important lessons from the ebook:  

Repetition is the key to learning

“Repetition, repetition, repetition: Information is best consumed through repetition. Sending only one piece of mail will do little to influence voters. Stick to a consistent message and hit voters with it repeatedly.” - Michael Bronstein, Bronstein and Weaver “Put yourself in the mind of the voter and the respondent: Most swing voters are not closely following your race. That’s what makes them swing, so every poll question should assume very little, be short and clear, and remove jargon and unnecessary numbers or acronyms.” - Margie Omero, Momentum Analysis At this point in the campaign, you have contacted your universe of targeted voters many times. You might wonder if there is value in contacting your supporter a few more times. In fact, you probably fear that one last call will push your supporter away. This is why it’s important to keep in mind what Margie Omero wrote; voters are not closely following your race. We are looking at voter contact from our perspective. You know when Election Day is, when the polls open and close, where your polling place is located and had your mind made up about who to vote for long before the average voter even knew who was running. Also, the average voter needs to hear different messages at the different times in the campaign. Even though you have secured a voters support, that doesn’t mean that you have their vote until they case their ballot at the polls, so don’t be afraid to contact your supporters during GOTV to remind them to vote.

Persuasion is a part of get out of the vote

“Simply saying “go vote,” without an element of persuasion, is noble but is off-message for your campaign and wastes an opportunity to convince an undecided voter or call a supporter to action.’ - Andrew Eldredge-Martin, Caucus Media “Persuasion: Identifying the voters most likely to be swayed over to your camp lets you focus on building your base at the expense of your opponents.” - Ted Blaszak, Democracy Resources During get out the vote, you need to contact such a large volume of people in such a short amount of time that you will look for ways to reduce the time it takes to contact each voter. One of those ways it to cut out extraneous information from your phone and canvassing scripts. Excluding a persuasion message in your GOTV program, however, is counterproductive. In Robert Cialdini’s book, Yes! 50 Scientifically Proven Ways to be Persuasive, he shared an experiment where an office worker asked to cut in line at the photocopier. One set of office workers just asked to cut in line. Another set asked to go first “because they needed to make copies.” Despite the latter group’s lackluster reason to cut in line, the person at the photocopier was more likely to let them go first. Of course, a meaningful reason is all the more effective. If you aren’t explaining the “because” part to voters during get out the vote, they will not be as motivated to vote for the candidate than if you incorporated a persuasion message into your GOTV scripts.

Time is of the essence

“Start your GOTV calls on the Thursday before Election Day. Wrap up by Monday evening, the day before the polls open. The prime time to call voters is between 5PM and 8PM.” - Moses Ross, PoliticalRobocalls.com Readng Moses Ross’s contribution to Get Out the Vote to Win, there are numerous references to time and the logistical structure to GOTV. Political campaigns have three resources at their disposal: time, money, and people. Time is the only nonrenewable resource among them and that pressure is all the more acute just prior to the election. To execute an effective GOTV campaign, you must be a task master. You must hit your numbers, so that you have a reliable outcome and increase in voter turnout among your supporters.

Conclusion

If you run an effective GOTV effort, you will increase your candidate’s performance by several points. In a close race, get out the vote means the difference between winning and losing. In a local campaign, GOTV can make the difference regardless. Click here for the free, Get Out the Vote to Win ebook for more GOTV tips and tricks.

« Older entries § Newer entries »

Powered by Netfirms